The sphere is imaginary. The missing spots are very real.
Every diffraction pattern in a transmission electron microscope lives in a strange, inside-out version of the crystal called reciprocal space. Once you can picture it, and the giant sphere that slices through it, diffraction patterns stop being mysterious dot art and start being maps.
A crystal is a repeating pattern of atoms. Its diffraction pattern is also a pattern of spots, but the two are related inversely: planes that are far apart in the crystal make spots that are close together in the pattern, and vice versa. Rotate the crystal, and the pattern rotates with it.
Reciprocal space contains a spot for every set of atomic planes. But your diffraction pattern only shows a few of them. Why those?
The rule is geometric. The electron beam is drawn as an arrow of length 1/λ (one over the electron wavelength), ending at the center spot. Sweep that arrow around and it traces a huge sphere: the Ewald sphere. A reciprocal-space spot appears in your pattern only if the sphere's surface passes through it (or close enough, more on that below).
Electron wavelengths are tiny: about 2.5 picometers at 200 kV (a Talos 200i) and 2.0 pm at 300 kV (a Spectra 300), so the sphere is enormous and its surface is nearly flat where it cuts through the spots. That's why a TEM pattern shows a whole plane of spots at once.
Strictly, the sphere should hit each spot exactly, which almost never happens. Yet real patterns are full of spots. The escape clause: your sample is a thin foil. Squeezing a crystal thin in one direction stretches its reciprocal-space spots into little rods along the beam direction, called relrods. The sphere only has to pass through the rod, not the point.
The miss distance, how far the sphere passes from the spot's center, is the excitation error, s. Small miss, bright spot; big miss, dim spot; beyond the rod, nothing.
Bragg's law, λ = 2d sinθ, sets the diffraction angle. In reciprocal space each set of planes becomes a vector g with |g| = 1/d. The incident beam is a wavevector k₀ with |k₀| = 1/λ; diffraction to k is allowed when k − k₀ = g (the Laue condition), which is precisely "g lies on the Ewald sphere."
At 200 kV the relativistic wavelength is λ ≈ 2.51 pm, so the sphere radius is 1/λ ≈ 398 nm⁻¹ while a typical |g| is only ~4–10 nm⁻¹: the sphere is ~50× larger than the pattern you record, hence nearly flat. At 300 kV, λ ≈ 1.97 pm and it's flatter still.
A foil of thickness t gives relrods of length ~2/t. In the kinematic finite-thickness model the diffracted intensity varies as sin²(πt s)/(πs)², the familiar sinc-squared shape, so intensity falls off smoothly with excitation error s and oscillates with thickness; dynamical diffraction reshapes the numbers in thicker foils, but not the geometry.
@misc{tripathy2026reciprocalspacetheewalds,
author = {Tripathy, Manisha},
title = {Reciprocal Space & the Ewald Sphere},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://untetheredatom.com/tem/ewald-sphere-guide}},
note = {Interactive teaching resource}
}