Contact Mechanics · Subsurface microstructure
Sliding-induced microstructure: what forms under a worn surface
Sliding a hard ball over metal shears the layer under the surface; published cross-sections show what forms.
What forms under copper in the first sliding pass?
Pick a stage and watch a sapphire sphere slide over pure copper.
Try it: switch "Start, mild" to "1 pass, 26 N": one line at about 150 nm becomes two, at 185 and 415 nm.
How deep does sliding change the metal?
Drag the probe down through copper after heavy sliding under a pressed flat tool.
Room temperature, 44 MPa, four passes.
Try it: press Play: the magnifier goes from thin lamellae to stretched grains to a coarser lamellar structure.
Can sliding itself make grains grow?
Pick the starting grain size of a nickel-tungsten (Ni-W) alloy, then slide.
6 mm tungsten carbide ball, 5 N, 10,000 cycles. The 3 nm alloy also has more tungsten (27.9 vs 8.2 at.%).
Try it: with 3 nm grains the top layer grows to 20 nm grains; at 25 nm almost nothing changes.
What to take away
A line forms first
In copper, one pass leaves a dislocation trace line about 90 to 470 nm deep, far shallower than the Hertz peak shear (7 to 76 µm).
Finest at the surface
Heavily slid copper is finest and hardest at the surface, coarser and softer deeper.
Sliding can grow grains
In Ni-W, 3 nm grains grew to 20 nm, mainly from local plasticity, not frictional heat.
More detail: test conditions, what is measured and what is drawn
Copper under a sapphire sphere
Haug et al. (2020) report that their group earlier found a horizontal line of dislocations at a uniform depth of about 150 nm under copper slid dry against a sapphire sphere (Greiner et al. 2016, under mild reciprocating loading), and named it the dislocation trace line. This page did not read Greiner et al. (2016) itself. The group's DFG project report says the line forms at the very start of sliding and later becomes a small angle grain boundary; deeper down, networks of geometrically necessary dislocations form sub-grains. The same report gives copper oxide clusters on the surface after roughly 100 cycles, and says the line was found over a wide range of speeds, loads and sphere sizes.
Haug et al. (2020) used a 10 mm sphere, 26 N (1.25 GPa peak Hertz pressure at the start), one pass at 0.5 mm/s, 22 °C and 52% humidity, on copper with 14 µm grains. They found two lines, at about 185 and 415 nm, and three processes: simple shear along the sliding direction, local shear at the lower line, and rotation of the crystal above and between the lines about the transverse direction. At a twin boundary the lower line took up 28 to 33° of misorientation and the upper one 5 to 8°. Defect density fell with depth. Sub-grains after one pass were linked to the high load and read as a precursor of the micro- or nanocrystalline layers seen after more cycles.
Ruebeling et al. (2021) varied load (2 to 100 N) and sphere size (1 to 10 mm), giving 530 to 1953 MPa peak Hertz pressure. After one pass the line sat at about 90 to 470 nm (their abstract rounds this to 100 to 400 nm), deeper at higher load and, at equal pressure, deeper under a larger sphere. Hertz theory puts the peak shear stress at about 7 to 76 µm, much deeper than the line. They propose that dislocations are pushed down at the front of the contact, move back up behind it, and stop where the stress falls to the critical resolved shear stress (the shear stress needed to move them on their slip plane). Below 6.75 N, dislocation features also formed below the line. The later stages on this page carry no depths because none were read in a source.
Graded layers in copper
Deng et al. (2016) pressed and slid a platen over copper at room temperature (44 MPa, 6.7 mm/s, four passes of 60 mm). Region I (0 to 15 µm) holds nanoscale lamellae 50 to 100 nm apart, region II (15 to 50 µm) fine grains stretched along the sliding direction, region III (50 to 120 µm) a regular lamellar deformation structure. The deformed zone reaches more than 1 mm. Hardness fell from about 2.28 GPa at the surface to about 1.04 GPa at 100 µm. A larger load gave a larger strain at every depth and a deeper zone. Their strain-depth profile is shown only as a figure, so this page does not plot strain. Hughes and Hansen (2001) found 10 nm structures near a heavily slid copper surface that coarsen with depth.
Grain growth under sliding
Rupert and Schuh (2010) slid a 6 mm tungsten carbide sphere at 5 N for 10,000 cycles (0.015 to 0.15 m/s, about 500 m) on Ni-W with 3 to 47 nm grains; finer grains came with more tungsten (3 to 27.9 at.%). In the 3 nm alloy a 100 to 300 nm thick top layer grew to 20 nm grains; the 25 nm alloy showed very little obvious change. Their upper bound for frictional heating was 500 °C, not high enough for long enough to explain the growth, and they linked it to local plasticity. Grain growth plus boundary relaxation hardened the track, so the finest alloys wore less than hardness predicts. Rupert et al. (2009) found, in tensile tests with no sliding, that shear stress drives grain boundary migration in nanocrystalline aluminium films that were stable at room temperature; growth tracked the distortional (shear) energy, not the volumetric energy.
On this site: Subsurface stresses · Wear mechanisms · Grain boundary migration · Tribofilms · Dislocations · Grain growth
Questions people ask
What is the changed layer under a sliding surface?
It is the near-surface layer whose structure, and sometimes chemistry, has been changed by sliding. Rigney (2000) wrote that plastic deformation early in sliding may come before transfer and mechanical mixing with the counterface material. Haug et al. (2020) note the changed layer can differ in structure and chemistry from either starting material.
What is the dislocation trace line?
It is a sharp line of dislocations parallel to the surface, found in copper after sliding by the Greiner group. After one pass it sat at about 90 to 470 nm, deeper at higher load and far shallower than the peak shear stress depth from Hertz contact theory (7 to 76 µm). It is the first break in the microstructure, and later becomes a small angle grain boundary.
Does frictional heat cause the grain growth in a wear track?
Not mainly, in the Ni-W study by Rupert and Schuh (2010). Their upper bound for frictional heating was 500 °C, which was not high enough for long enough to explain the growth. They linked it to local plasticity; work they cite points to shear stress as the driving force.
Why can nanocrystalline metals wear less than their hardness predicts?
Rupert and Schuh (2010) found that the finest Ni-W alloys resisted wear better than expected from hardness alone, a departure from Archard scaling (the expectation that wear falls as hardness rises). Sliding caused some grain growth and grain boundary relaxation, which hardened the wear track.
How deep does sliding deformation reach?
It depends on the load and the test. One pass on copper put the dislocation trace line about 90 to 470 nm deep. Heavy platen sliding on copper changed the structure to more than 1 mm deep.
Is the structure finest at the surface?
In heavily slid copper, yes. Hughes and Hansen (2001) saw 10 nm structures near the surface that coarsened with depth. Deng et al. (2016) found hardness falling from 2.28 GPa at the surface to 1.04 GPa at 100 µm.
References
Show the 9 references
- C. Greiner, Z. Liu, L. Strassberger and P. Gumbsch, Sequence of stages in the microstructure evolution in copper under mild reciprocating tribological loading, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 8, 15809 to 15819 (2016). doi:10.1021/acsami.6b04035
- C. Haug, F. Ruebeling, A. Kashiwar, P. Gumbsch, C. Kübel and C. Greiner, Early deformation mechanisms in the shear affected region underneath a copper sliding contact, Nature Communications 11, 839 (2020). doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14640-2
- F. Ruebeling, Y. Xu, G. Richter, D. Dini, P. Gumbsch and C. Greiner, Normal load and counter body size influence the initiation of microstructural discontinuities in copper during sliding, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13, 4750 to 4760 (2021). doi:10.1021/acsami.0c19736
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, project 216674563, Size effects and microstructure evolution in textured metal surfaces during reciprocating sliding: final results summary, GEPRIS (gepris.dfg.de).
- D. A. Rigney, Transfer, mixing and associated chemical and mechanical processes during the sliding of ductile materials, Wear 245, 1 to 9 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00460-9
- D. A. Hughes and N. Hansen, Graded nanostructures produced by sliding and exhibiting universal behavior, Physical Review Letters 87, 135503 (2001). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.135503
- S. Q. Deng, A. Godfrey, W. Liu and N. Hansen, A gradient nanostructure generated in pure copper by platen friction sliding deformation, Scripta Materialia 117, 41 to 45 (2016).
- T. J. Rupert and C. A. Schuh, Sliding wear of nanocrystalline Ni-W: structural evolution and the apparent breakdown of Archard scaling, Acta Materialia 58, 4137 to 4148 (2010).
- T. J. Rupert, D. S. Gianola, Y. Gan and K. J. Hemker, Experimental observations of stress-driven grain boundary migration, Science 326, 1686 (2009).
BibTeX
@misc{tripathy2026slidingmicrostructure,
author = {Tripathy, Manisha},
title = {Sliding-Induced Microstructure Lab},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://untetheredatom.com/tribology/sliding-induced-microstructure}},
note = {Interactive web tool}
}